Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The scientific impact derived From the disciplinary profiles

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Allik, Jüri, Lauk, Kalmer and Realo, Anu (2020) The scientific impact derived From the disciplinary profiles. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 5 . 569268. doi:10.3389/frma.2020.569268 ISSN 2504-0537.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-scientific-impact-derived-disciplinary-profiles-Realo-2020.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1107Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.569268

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The disciplinary profiles of the mean citation rates across 22 research areas were analyzed for 107 countries/territories that published at least 3,000 papers that exceeded the entrance thresholds for the Essential Science Indicators (ESI; Clarivate Analytics) during the period from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2019. The matrix of pairwise differences between any two profiles was analyzed with a non-metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) algorithm, which recovered a two-dimensional geometric space describing these differences. These two dimensions, Dim1 and Dim2, described 5,671 pairwise differences between countries' disciplinary profiles with a sufficient accuracy (stress = 0.098). A significant correlation (r = 0.81, N = 107, p < 0.0001) was found between Dim1 and the Indicator of a Nation's Scientific Impact (INSI), which was computed as a composite of the average and the top citation rates. The scientific impact ranking of countries derived from the pairwise differences between disciplinary profiles seems to be more accurate and realistic compared with more traditional citation indices.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > Q Science (General)
Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > Z665 Library Science. Information Science
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Scientific literature, Science -- Methodology, Bibliometrics, Scholarly periodicals -- Ratings and rankings
Journal or Publication Title: Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
Publisher: Frontiers Media
ISSN: 2504-0537
Official Date: 16 October 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
16 October 2020Published
17 August 2020Accepted
Volume: 5
Article Number: 569268
DOI: 10.3389/frma.2020.569268
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 23 October 2020
Date of first compliant Open Access: 23 October 2020

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us