The Library
Don’t feel obligated, lest it be undesirable : the relationship between prohibitives and apprehensives in Papapana and beyond
Tools
Tools
Tools
Smith-Dennis, Ellen (2021) Don’t feel obligated, lest it be undesirable : the relationship between prohibitives and apprehensives in Papapana and beyond. Linguistic Typology . doi:10.1515/lingty-2020-2070 (In Press)
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-Dont-feel-obligated-undesirable-prohibitives-Papapana-2021.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only until 21 January 2022. Contact author directly, specifying your specific needs. - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1588Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2070
Abstract
This paper analyses the preverbal morpheme te, used in both apprehensive ‘precautioning’ sentences and in one of two prohibitive constructions in Papapana (papa1265, Austronesian, Oceanic; Papua New Guinea). I aim to establish whether there is a diachronic relationship between the two functions of te, and in which direction, how and why semantic change may have occurred. This requires consideration of the synchronic differences between Papapana prohibitives, comparisons with apprehensive and prohibitive constructions in other Oceanic languages, and an investigation of other languages where apprehensive and prohibitive morphemes are formally similar/identical. I argue that the two functions of te are diachronically related, but not polysemous, and that the prohibitive meaning developed from the apprehensive meaning via insubordination. This supports Pakendorf, Brigitte & Ewa Schalley’s proposed pathway of development from possibility to prohibition, via apprehension and warning. However, I argue that their pathway does not, as claimed, run counter to the proposed grammaticalisation path of deontic to epistemic modality, because prohibitives are arguably not deontic. This paper contributes to the growing body of research on apprehensives, demonstrates that the pathway from apprehension to prohibition is perhaps not as rare as Pakendorf and Schalley thought, and contributes to research on language change and modality.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics P Language and Literature > PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania |
|||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Applied Linguistics | |||||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Austronesian languages , Linguistic change , Historical linguistics, Austronesian languages -- Semantics | |||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Linguistic Typology | |||||||||
| Publisher: | De Gruyter | |||||||||
| ISSN: | 1430-0532 | |||||||||
| Official Date: | 21 January 2021 | |||||||||
| Dates: |
|
|||||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 27 January 2021 | |||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1515/lingty-2020-2070 | |||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | |||||||||
| Publication Status: | In Press | |||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | |||||||||
| Copyright Holders: | © 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston | |||||||||
| RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
