The Library
Rule of the knowers : the epistocratic challenge to democracy
Tools
Giavazzi, Michele (2020) Rule of the knowers : the epistocratic challenge to democracy. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
|
PDF
WRAP_Theses_Giavazzi_2020.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1692Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b3517387~S15
Abstract
In recent years, scepticism about democracy’s ability to deliver good political decisions has resurfaced. In response, some political philosophers have argued that we should replace democracy with epistocracy. In this political system, the exercise of political decision-making powers – including the exercise of the right to vote – is made formally conditional on a sufficient degree of political competence.
The purpose of this thesis is to evaluate the normative justifiability of epistocracy. Whereas most political philosophers firmly reject epistocracy and support democracy, I will instead defend an uncommon middle-ground view.
More precisely, I will defend what I call the civic argument for epistemic constraints on voting. According to this argument, voters have a civic duty (an obligation grounded in the normativity of joint agency) to uphold the demands associated with their role in political decision making practices and owe each other compliance with this duty. Given the distinctively epistemic dimension that characterizes their role, the civic duty of voters is to act in an epistemically responsible way by exercising a cluster of epistemic capacities. I then contend that some limited constraints on participation in voting can be normatively justified as a way to ensure, as much as possible, that voters act in an epistemically responsible way.
This view provides a novel contribution to the debate, one that can resist some standard egalitarian objections to epistocracy and yet avoid some of the most radical conclusions of standard accounts of epistocracy.
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BD Speculative Philosophy B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology J Political Science > JC Political theory |
||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Democracy -- Philosophy, Expertise -- Political aspects, Knowledge, Theory of -- Political aspects | ||||
Official Date: | September 2020 | ||||
Dates: |
|
||||
Institution: | University of Warwick | ||||
Theses Department: | Department of Philosophy | ||||
Thesis Type: | PhD | ||||
Publication Status: | Unpublished | ||||
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: | Peter, Fabienne | ||||
Format of File: | |||||
Extent: | iv, 162 leaves | ||||
Language: | eng |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |