Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

"The People Watching at Home” : an analysis of political disagreement in a public inquiry event

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Underwood, Tom W. and Angouri, Jo (2021) "The People Watching at Home” : an analysis of political disagreement in a public inquiry event. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 9 (2). pp. 297-323. doi:10.1075/jlac.00068.und ISSN 2213-1272.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-The-people-watching-home-political-disagreement-public-inquiry-event-2021.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (1222Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00068.und

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This paper explores disagreement practice in political discourse, specifically in the under explored public inquiry communicative event and more specifically in the select-committee hearing. We revisit earlier work on theorising disagreement to expand our understanding of its contextual nature, particularly in relation to the making of ideology.

Public inquiries combine the characteristics of professional meetings with characteristics of political discourse. They are typified by hybridised and ambiguous role expectations which participants negotiate in and through (potentially competing) practices in doing the ideological work demanded by the policy process. In this context, disagreement emerges as key to the performance of the interactants’ situated and explicit/semi-permanent roles as professional politicians.

By applying Critical Interactional Sociolinguistic analysis within a wider frame of audience design, we demonstrate the importance of the ideological role of disagreement to the policy process. We argue that further attention needs to be given to the policy talk in meso-level political events, such as the public inquiry, which connect the ideological (macro) political domains of human activity with the (micro) here and now of talk. We close the paper with directions for further research.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Applied Linguistics
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing
ISSN: 2213-1272
Official Date: August 2021
Dates:
DateEvent
August 2021Published
5 July 2021Available
20 January 2021Accepted
Volume: 9
Number: 2
Page Range: pp. 297-323
DOI: 10.1075/jlac.00068.und
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): This article is under copyright, the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form (© John Benjamins Publishing Company. This work is licensed under a license. Publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form)
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 7 June 2021
Date of first compliant Open Access: 27 August 2021
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us