The Library
Understanding the effects of lying by fabrication on memory for the truth
Tools
Rowthorn, Harriet (2020) Understanding the effects of lying by fabrication on memory for the truth. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
|
PDF
WRAP_Theses_Rowthorn_2020.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1714Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b3710439
Abstract
Accurate memory matters nowhere more than in criminal cases, but research shows that people’s memory reports can be contaminated by misinformation spread by others. An increasing body of evidence shows that people can also contaminate their own memories when they lie. However, a theory of how lying can affect memory has been slow to develop. The experiments within this thesis therefore aimed to further our understanding of how fabrication can affect later memory for the truth and test some of the hypotheses generated by two existing relevant theories: von Hippel and Trivers’ theory of self-deception and the memory and deception (MAD) framework.
Experiments 1-3 test von Hippel and Trivers’ proposal that repeating lies can promote forgetting of the truth via retrieval-induced forgetting. No evidence was found for this claim: Memory for information that participants repeatedly lied about did not differ from baseline. The thesis then turns to the relationship between the cognitive effort of fabrication and subsequent memory errors, as both theories are centered on the concept of cognitive load in deception. Some challenges are presented to the MAD framework’s hypotheses concerning the relationship between the cognitive effort of fabrication and subsequent memory errors. The findings of Experiments 4-5 highlight the need to reconsider the nature of this relationship: Different methods of increasing liars’ cognitive load moderated the effect of fabrication on memory. Finally, Experiment 6 tested the possibility that fabricating in a previous interview might decrease the accuracy of the Concealed Information Test (CIT)—a physiological deception detection test that relies on strong memory for the truth. Prior fabrication did not decrease the CIT’s accuracy. Together, these findings help to refine models of lying and memory. Additionally, the findings raise concerns about contamination of revised testimonies after fabrication and highlight potential issues for increasing cognitive load for lie detection.
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology | ||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Truthfulness and falsehood. , Memory consolidation, Memory -- Psychological aspects | ||||
Official Date: | March 2020 | ||||
Dates: |
|
||||
Institution: | University of Warwick | ||||
Theses Department: | Department of Psychology | ||||
Thesis Type: | PhD | ||||
Publication Status: | Unpublished | ||||
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: | Wade, Kimberley A. ; Watson, Derrick G. | ||||
Sponsors: | Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) | ||||
Format of File: | |||||
Extent: | 229 leaves : illustrations | ||||
Language: | eng |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year