Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Taking the New Year’s Resolution Test seriously : eliciting individuals’ judgements about self-control and spontaneity

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Grubiak, Kevin, Isoni, Andrea, Sugden, Robert, Wang, Mengjie and Zheng, Jiwei (2022) Taking the New Year’s Resolution Test seriously : eliciting individuals’ judgements about self-control and spontaneity. Behavioural Public Policy . doi:10.1017/bpp.2021.41 ISSN 2398-063X. (In Press)

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-Taking-New-Years-Resolution-Test-seriously-eliciting-judgements-self-control-2021.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (294Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-Taking-New-Years-Resolution-Test-seriously-eliciting-judgements-self-control-2021.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (784Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.41

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Self-control failure occurs when an individual experiences a conflict between immediate desires and longer-term goals, recognises psychological forces that hinder goal-directed action, tries to resist them but fails in the attempt. Behavioural economists often invoke assumptions about self-control failure to justify proposals for policy interventions. These arguments require workable methods for eliciting individuals’ goals and for verifying occurrences of self-control failure, but developing such methods confronts two problems. First, it is not clear that individuals’ goals are context-independent. Second, facing an actual conflict between a desire and a self-acknowledged goal, a person may consciously choose not to resist the desire, thinking that spontaneity is more important than self-control. We address these issues through an online survey that elicited individuals’ self-reported judgements about the relative importance of self-control and spontaneity in conflicts between enjoyment and health-related goals. To test for context-sensitivity, the judgement-elicitation questions were preceded by a memory recall task which directed participants’ attention either to the enjoyment of acting on desires or to the satisfaction of achieving goals. We found little evidence of context-sensitivity. In both treatments, however, judgements that favoured spontaneity were expressed with roughly the same frequency and strength as judgments that favoured self-control.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Spontaneity (Personality trait) , Self-control , Paternalism , Libertarianism, Choice (Psychology), Social choice, Decision making, Economics—Psychological aspects
Journal or Publication Title: Behavioural Public Policy
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 2398-063X
Official Date: 31 January 2022
Dates:
DateEvent
31 January 2022Published
17 November 2021Accepted
DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.41
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: In Press
Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): This article has been accepted for publication in a revised form for publication in Behavioural Public Policy. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-public-policy
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Copyright Holders: Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Date of first compliant deposit: 23 November 2021
Date of first compliant Open Access: 24 November 2021
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
ES/P008976/1[ESRC] Economic and Social Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269
670103Horizon 2020 Framework Programmehttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010661
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us