Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Case Note: 'From ‘non-marriage’ to ‘non-qualifying ceremony’

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Akhtar, Rajnaara C. (2020) Case Note: 'From ‘non-marriage’ to ‘non-qualifying ceremony’. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 42 (4). pp. 384-387. doi:10.1080/09649069.2020.1796375

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2020.1796375

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The landmark first instance decision in Akhter v Khan [2018] EWFC 54 was welcomed by women’s rights activists campaigning for legal recognition of religious- only marriages in England. The judgment seemed to indicate a move away from the pre-established legal position of ‘non-marriage’ occupied by those in religious-only marriages where no steps were taken to undergo a ceremony recognised under English law. Williams J pronounced a decree of nullity in this case based on its particular facts, despite no civil ceremony; taking a ‘flexible’ approach to the interpretation of section 11 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (2018: [94], [96]). However, the purposive legal reasoning which included human rights law justifica- tions was widely critiqued and the resultant uncertainty in the law, no doubt compounded by a fear of floodgates and media misreporting (e.g. British court recognises Sharia law in landmark divorce case, The Telegraph, 1 Aug 2018) culmi- nated in an appeal by the Attorney General. In Attorney General v Akhter and Khan [2020] EWCA Civ 122 the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, rejecting the flexible approach in the earlier decision and reinforcing the applicability of the ‘non- marriage’ category, albeit relabelled as ‘non-qualifying ceremony’ (2020: [7], [64]). I will begin by outlining the facts of the case and the first instance decision, before moving on to consider why this reasoning was rejected on appeal.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: K Law [LC] > K Law (General)
K Law [LC] > KBP Islamic law
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
Publisher: Taylor Francis
Official Date: 28 July 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
28 July 2020Published
1 June 2020Accepted
Volume: 42
Number: 4
Page Range: pp. 384-387
DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2020.1796375
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us