Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The effect of mode of delivery on health-related quality-of-life in mothers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Evans, Kate, Fraser, Hannah, Uthman, Olalekan A., Osokogu, Osemeke, Johnson, Samantha Ann and Al-Khudairy, Lena (2022) The effect of mode of delivery on health-related quality-of-life in mothers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22 (1). p. 149. doi:10.1186/s12884-022-04473-w ISSN 1471-2393.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-effect-mode-delivery-health-related-quality-of-life-mothers-22.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (3373Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04473-w

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Background: Previous research is inconclusive on the effects of mode of delivery on maternal health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the current evidence for associations between mode of delivery and postpartum health-related quality-of-life. Methods: Electronic databases MEDLINE ALL (OVID), Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL and EMBASE (OVID) were searched for English written articles investigating the relationship between mode of delivery and quality-of-life published form inception to 15th October 2020. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, assessed full texts, and extracted data. Meta-analysis was conducted where possible. Results: Twenty-one studies, including 19,879 women, met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of 18 studies found HRQoL scores were significantly higher for women after vaginal delivery in comparison to caesarean (emergency and elective combined) (Effect Size (ES) 0.17, 95% CI 0.01–0.25, n = 7665) with highest scores after assisted vaginal delivery (ES 0.21, 95% CI 0.13–0.30, n = 2547). Physical functioning (ES 11.18, 95% CI = 2.29–20.06, n = 1746), physical role (ES 13.10, 95% CI = 1.16–25.05, n = 1471), vitality (ES 6.31, 95% CI = 1.14–10.29, n = 1746) and social functioning (ES 5.69, 95% CI = 1.26–10.11, n = 1746) were significantly higher after vaginal delivery compared to caesarean. Conclusions: Health-related quality-of-life scores were higher for women after vaginal delivery in comparison to caesarean section. Consequently, women should be encouraged to deliver vaginally where possible. The findings of this research should be available to the relevant population to help support informed choice.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
SWORD Depositor: Library Publications Router
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Systematic reviews (Medical research), Meta-analysis, Childbirth, Cesarean section, Mothers -- Medical care, Maternal health services, Mothers -- Health and hygiene, New mothers -- Health and hygiene, Well-being, Pregnancy
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Publisher: BioMed Central
ISSN: 1471-2393
Official Date: 22 February 2022
Dates:
DateEvent
22 February 2022Published
11 February 2022Accepted
Volume: 22
Number: 1
Page Range: p. 149
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04473-w
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): ** From Springer Nature via Jisc Publications Router ** History: received 23-08-2021; accepted 11-02-2022; registration 15-02-2022; pub-electronic 22-02-2022; online 22-02-2022; collection 12-2022. ** Licence for this article: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 27 September 2022
Date of first compliant Open Access: 27 September 2022
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
Warwick Evidence[NIHR] National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands[NIHR] National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
LibraryUniversity of Warwickhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000741
UNSPECIFIEDJohnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Developmenthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100014489
Related URLs:
  • http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4...

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us