Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Strong sustainability ethics

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Bourban, Michel (2022) Strong sustainability ethics. Environmental Ethics, 43 (4). pp. 291-314. doi:10.5840/enviroethics202211332 ISSN 0163-4275.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-Strong-sustainability-ethics-Bourban-2021.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (391Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics202211332

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This article explains how strong sustainability ethics has emerged and developed as a new field over the last two decades as a critical response to influential conceptions of weak sustainability. It investigates three competing, normative approaches to strong sustainability: the communitarian approach, the Rawlsian approach, and the capabilities approach. Although these approaches converge around the idea that there are critical, non-substitutable natural resources and services, they diverge on how to reconcile human development and environmental protection. The aim of the paper is to provide a critical overview of these three perspectives, but also and mostly to show that when we put them into dialogue with each other, we can clarify the demands of sustainability. The paper concludes that the capabilities approach is the most suitable way to think about sustainability, but only if it goes beyond its dominantly anthropocentric view.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Environmental ethics , Environmental responsibility , Sustainability , Ethics
Journal or Publication Title: Environmental Ethics
Publisher: Philosophy Documentation Center
ISSN: 0163-4275
Official Date: 14 April 2022
Dates:
DateEvent
14 April 2022Published
1 October 2021Accepted
Volume: 43
Number: 4
Page Range: pp. 291-314
DOI: 10.5840/enviroethics202211332
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Copyright Holders: Environmental Philosophy Inc.
Date of first compliant deposit: 25 April 2022
Date of first compliant Open Access: 25 April 2022
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
190981[SNSF] Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschunghttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us