Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Being and interpretation : Kant, Heidegger, and fundamental ontology

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Hetterley, Jae (2022) Being and interpretation : Kant, Heidegger, and fundamental ontology. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Theses_Hetterley_2022.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (2316Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b3781074

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The aim of this thesis is to provide a systematic interpretation of the influence of Kant’s theoretical philosophy on Heidegger’s early project of ‘fundamental ontology’. Beginning from Heidegger’s early neo-Kantianism, I trace the development of his engagement with Kant through to his post-transcendental thinking of the 1930s. However, my particular focus concerns Being and Time. Here, I argue that there is a structural analogy between Kant’s conception of the imagination and Heidegger’s conception of disclosedness, both of which define their respective ontological approaches. Moreover, I argue that making such an analogy allows us to draw out a single, clear line of argument in Being and Time that should guide our interpretation of the text. Through this, I argue that the question of transcendence is the key explanandum for Heidegger’s early project, and that a rethinking of Kantian schematism is Heidegger’s answer for this. Consequently, a further strategic aim is to critically examine Heidegger’s conception of schematism: to what extent can we defend and develop further the notion of schematism in considering the grounds of ontology? The thesis is divided into three parts. The first traces the development of Heidegger’s project of fundamental ontology and attempts to locate Kant’s place within it. I argue that Heidegger’s conception of phenomenology as method develops from his critical engagements with his contemporaries (in particular, Rickert, Husserl, and Dilthey), whereas the terms of his project as defined by the Seinsfrage derives from his interpretation of the history of philosophy (in particular, Aristotle and the Scholastics). My claim is that Heidegger consequently develops an ontological interpretation of Kant to connect the two: the Copernican Revolution provides a way to think a phenomenological ontology that does not reduce to anthropology, whilst Kant’s notion of the imagination provides a formal structure through which to think Dasein’s ontologically disclosive abilities. The second part provides an extended comparative analysis of the first Critique with Being and Time, aiming to show how Heidegger’s concept of worldhood is a phenomenological reconsideration of the key themes of the Transcendental Deduction, and that Heidegger’s notoriously difficult account of ecstatic temporality becomes comprehensible when read alongside the Schematism. Through this, I aim to demonstrate the imagination/disclosedness analogy in practice, whilst also clarifying the problematic of transcendence that underlies their respective accounts. The final part then takes up the notion of transcendence as an explicit theme, firstly attempting to retrieve a positive signification for transcendence despite the later Heidegger’s retrospective criticisms. Then I return to the question of the relationship between transcendence and schematism in the final chapter, providing an interpretation and defence of Heidegger’s concept of ‘praesens’ as a proof of concept for further inquiry into this rich philosophical field.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BD Speculative Philosophy
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 -- Criticism and interpretation, Heidegger, Martin, 1889-1976 -- Criticism and interpretation, Ontology, Transcendence (Philosophy), Schematism (Philosophy)
Official Date: March 2022
Dates:
DateEvent
March 2022UNSPECIFIED
Institution: University of Warwick
Theses Department: Department of Philosophy
Thesis Type: PhD
Publication Status: Unpublished
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: Beistegui, Miguel de, 1966-
Format of File: pdf
Extent: xiii, 264 leaves
Language: eng

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us