Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Effect of oral tumour size on quality of life judgements by health care professionals working with head and neck cancer patients: a pilot study

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Reid, K., Hicks, C., Herron-Marx, Sandra and Parmar, S. (2009) Effect of oral tumour size on quality of life judgements by health care professionals working with head and neck cancer patients: a pilot study. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, Vol.123 (No.12). pp. 1352-1357. doi:10.1017/S0022215109990934 ISSN 0022-2151.

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215109990934

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Aim: To investigate whether information about the size of an oral tumour influences the multi-disciplinary team's judgement about the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients.

Method: Using a between-group design, two groups of health care professionals rated a hypothetical patient on 20 outcome variables. The patient description was identical for both groups, except for the tumour size.

Results: Comparison of variable ratings revealed only three significant differences between the groups' predictions and no consistency within conditions, suggesting that the participants held few common assumptions about the impact of tumour size on a range of patient experiences.

Conclusion: The lack of agreement amongst the health care professionals suggests that, where humane judgements are used in treatment decisions for head and neck cancer patients, these may be random and inconsistent. Consequently, patients should have a direct input into treatment decisions, via formalised quality of life data.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RF Otorhinolaryngology
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Laryngology and Otology
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 0022-2151
Official Date: December 2009
Dates:
DateEvent
December 2009Published
Volume: Vol.123
Number: No.12
Number of Pages: 6
Page Range: pp. 1352-1357
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215109990934
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us