Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

A fundamental dichotomy in ELT methodology : a response to May Pang

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Anderson, Jason (2016) A fundamental dichotomy in ELT methodology : a response to May Pang. ELT Journal, 71 (1). pp. 92-95. doi:10.1093/elt/ccw071 ISSN 0951-0893.

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw071

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

In her article ‘Companion guides for lesson planning: a planning template and the lesson plan pro forma’ (2016a), May Pang offers a critique of my earlier article, ‘Affordance, learning opportunities, and the lesson plan pro forma’ (Anderson 2015), in which I call for changes to typical ELT lesson plan pro formas to enable them to be compatible with a wider range of teaching approaches, especially with regard to how learning opportunities are predicted, and how affordance is dealt with while teaching. I would like to begin by thanking Pang (2016a) for her critique of my article, and I welcome the discussion. Before responding to her criticisms, I would like to commend Pang’s useful suggestions for supporting pre-service teacher education through the use of a planning template and simplified lesson planning pro forma (Pang 2016a, b). However, Pang’s interest in the role of lesson planning in teacher education has, I fear, led to her misreading the intention of my article, and the arguments I put forward therein.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2361 Curriculum
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Applied Linguistics
Journal or Publication Title: ELT Journal
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 0951-0893
Official Date: 6 October 2016
Dates:
DateEvent
6 October 2016Published
2 September 2016Accepted
Volume: 71
Number: 1
Page Range: pp. 92-95
DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccw071
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us