Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Anxious vigilance and the production of (il)legitimacy in the UK citizenship regime : “it’s how you sift them out, y’know?”

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Lewis, Rachel (2022) Anxious vigilance and the production of (il)legitimacy in the UK citizenship regime : “it’s how you sift them out, y’know?”. Conflict and Society, 8 (1). pp. 125-141. doi:10.3167/arcs.2022.080108 ISSN 2164-4543.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-anxious-vigilance-production-(il)legitimacy-UK-citizenship-regime-Lewis-2022.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (4Mb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3167/arcs.2022.080108

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This article examines the navigation and enactment of vigilance in the UK citizenship regime. Drawing on data from a four-year research project in a UK city, including observations of citizenship ceremonies and interviews with institutional actors and citizen-candidates, it sees vigilance as a central feature of the naturalization process, with watchfulness oriented toward three key areas: the bureaucratic precision, the linguistic proficiency, and the commitment to the nation evidenced by the citizen-candidate. It sees the navigation of anxious vigilance among all actors—state, institutional, and citizen-candidates—but argues that this is directed unevenly, with the state’s securitizing gaze particularly maintained upon those racialized as Other. Reading citizenship in domopolitical terms as a technology through which the securitized state can enact its bordering practices, it sees the vigilance enacted in the naturalization process as productive: as working to realize the legitimacy of the state and the Good citizen, to articulate and exclude from membership those deemed illegitimate, and, ultimately, to curtail possibilities for solidarity.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
J Political Science > JC Political theory
J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain
K Law [Moys] > KF Common Law, British Isles
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
SWORD Depositor: Library Publications Router
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Citizenship , Citizenship -- Great Britain, Allegiance , Responsibility , Marginality, Social -- Political aspects, Naturalization
Journal or Publication Title: Conflict and Society
Publisher: Berghahn Journals
ISSN: 2164-4543
Official Date: 1 June 2022
Dates:
DateEvent
1 June 2022Published
15 November 2022Accepted
Volume: 8
Number: 1
Page Range: pp. 125-141
DOI: 10.3167/arcs.2022.080108
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 5 January 2023
Date of first compliant Open Access: 5 January 2023

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us