Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Public inquiry into state violence : the epistemic question

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Williams, Andrew (2023) Public inquiry into state violence : the epistemic question. Critical Military Studies . pp. 1-24. doi:10.1080/23337486.2023.2210799 ISSN 2333-7486. (In Press)

[img] PDF
WRAP-Public-inquiry-state-violence-epistemic-question-23.pdf - Accepted Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only until 10 November 2024. Contact author directly, specifying your specific needs. - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (501Kb)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2023.2210799

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This article examines the problem of recent UK public inquiries into military controversies both in general (the waging of war) and particular (individual killings). It first sets out their potential and actual value as well as the critiques that threaten their legitimacy. Arguing that the benefits of the process make the public inquiry worthy as an apt intra-state device for uncovering unlawful military violence, revealing the ‘truth’ of a matter, apportioning responsibility and changing practices, it then asks whether or how this promise might be better fulfilled by addressing some of its identified conceptual and practical flaws? The article then focuses on the epistemic dimension, arguing that if public inquiry is to serve as a valid truth-seeking mechanism, it will first need to address not only the identification of what and whose knowledge should be sought through inquiry (the general epistemic question), but also the way in which that knowledge is to be found and presented (the zetetic question). Without attending to both matters, reforming the current statutory framework of the Inquiries Act 2005, public inquiry into military wrongs is likely to disappoint as an independent, impartial and inclusive process that fails to satisfy basic accountability norms.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: J Political Science > JC Political theory
J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
SWORD Depositor: Library Publications Router
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Governmental investigations , Governmental investigations -- Great Britain, Government accountability -- Great Britain, War crimes , War crimes investigation
Journal or Publication Title: Critical Military Studies
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 2333-7486
Official Date: 10 May 2023
Dates:
DateEvent
10 May 2023Published
28 April 2023Accepted
Page Range: pp. 1-24
DOI: 10.1080/23337486.2023.2210799
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: In Press
Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Military Studies on 10/05/2023, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/23337486.2023.2210799
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 19 May 2023

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us