Francis, Leslie J., Robbins, Mandy and Village, Andrew (2009) Psychological type and the pulpit : an empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics. Hervormde Teologiese Studies, Vol.65 (No.1). pp. 171-177. ISSN 0259-9422.

PDF WRAP_Francis_0673558-ie-170210-psychological_type.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (268Kb)

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

A sample of 389 experienced preachers completed a measure of psychological type. They then read Mark 1:29-39 and recorded their evaluations of the four reflections on this passage proposed by Francis (1997) and which were derived from the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics and liturgical preaching. Three main conclusions are drawn from these data. First, compared with the United Kingdom population norms, preachers within this sample were significantly more likely to prefer introversion, intuition, feeling and judging. Second, preachers were four times more likely to prefer a sensing interpretation of the text rather than a thinking interpretation, emphasising the richness of the narrative rather than facing the theological questions posed by it. Third, there was little evidence to suggest that preachers were less likely to appreciate interpretations consonant with their less preferred or inferior function than those consonant with their most preferred or dominant function. In this sense, the richness of the SIFT method should be accessible to preachers of all psychological types.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BS The Bible B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education ( -2013)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Bible. N.T. Mark, Typology (Psychology) -- Religious aspects -- Christianity, Bible -- Hermeneutics, Preaching -- Research
Journal or Publication Title:	Hervormde Teologiese Studies
Publisher:	University of Pretoria
ISSN:	0259-9422
Official Date:	2009
Dates:	Date Event 2009 Published
Volume:	Vol.65
Number:	No.1
Number of Pages:	7
Page Range:	pp. 171-177
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access (Creative Commons)

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads