Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Mechanical chest-compression devices: current and future roles

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Perkins, Gavin D., Brace, Samantha J. and Gates, Simon (2010) Mechanical chest-compression devices: current and future roles. Current Opinion in Critical Care, Vol.16 (No.3). pp. 203-210. doi:10.1097/MCC.0b013e328339cf59 ISSN 1070-5295.

[img] PDF
WRAP_Brace_220710-mechanical_chest_compression_devices-submitted.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (472Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0b013e328339cf59

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Purpose of review: It is recognised that the quality of CPR is an important predictor of outcome from cardiac arrest yet studies consistently demonstrate that the quality of CPR performed in real life is frequently sub-optimal. Mechanical chest compression devices provide an alternative to manual CPR. This review will consider the evidence and current indications for the use of these devices.
Recent findings: Physiological and animal data suggest that mechanical chest compression devices are more effective than manual CPR. However there is no high quality evidence showing improved outcomes in humans. There are specific circumstances where it may not be possible to perform manual CPR effectively e.g. during ambulance transport to hospital, en-route to and during cardiac catheterisation, prior to organ donation and during diagnostic imaging where using these devices may be advantageous.
Summary: There is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of mechanical chest compression devices. There may be specific circumstances when CPR is difficult or impossible where mechanical devices may play an important role in maintaining circulation. There is an urgent need for definitive clinical and cost effectiveness trials to confirm or refute the place of mechanical chest compression devices during resuscitation.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): CPR (First aid), Cardiac arrest -- Treatment, Critical care medicine -- Research, Emergency medicine -- Research, Medical instruments and apparatus
Journal or Publication Title: Current Opinion in Critical Care
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
ISSN: 1070-5295
Official Date: June 2010
Dates:
DateEvent
June 2010Published
Volume: Vol.16
Number: No.3
Page Range: pp. 203-210
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328339cf59
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Great Britain. Dept. of Health (DoH)

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us