Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Cutting the Gordian knot of legitimacy theory? : an anatomy of Frank Michelman's presentist critique of constitutional authorship

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Kuo, Ming-Sung (2009) Cutting the Gordian knot of legitimacy theory? : an anatomy of Frank Michelman's presentist critique of constitutional authorship. International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol.7 (No.4). pp. 683-714. doi:10.1093/icon/mop024 ISSN 1474-2659.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Kuo_Cutting_Gordian_knot.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (490Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mop024

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The question of legitimacy occupies center stage in debates on various constitutional developments. For as long as constitutional scholars cannot settle on a theory of legitimacy, the specter of a legitimacy deficit will continue to haunt the practitioners of constitutional law. Constitutional scholar Frank Michelman engages different schools of constitutional theory, seeking the definitive answer to the legitimacy question. He classifies theories of legitimacy into three categories, premised on notions of contract, acceptance, or authorship. Arguing that contract-based and acceptanceoriented legitimacy theories assume the notion of authorship, he distinguishes constitutional authorship in terms of its presumed transtemporal character and abandons it because of this character. To cut this Gordian knot, Michelman proposes a presentist view of legitimacy. Through an analysis of his theoretical engagement, this article argues that his effort to abandon authorship-based theories fails. A commonly chosen, authoritative dispute- settling institution, in line with Michelman’s presentist alternative, cannot stand without assuming a transtemporal concept of constitutional authorship. Thus the Gordian knot remains.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: J Political Science > JC Political theory
K Law [Moys] > KM Common Law, Public Law
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Legitimacy of governments, Constitutional law
Journal or Publication Title: International Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 1474-2659
Official Date: 2009
Dates:
DateEvent
2009Published
Volume: Vol.7
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 683-714
DOI: 10.1093/icon/mop024
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 16 December 2015
Date of first compliant Open Access: 16 December 2015
Related URLs:
  • Other Repository

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us