
The Library
Power/knowledge - untying the knot : an examination of a penological method
Tools
Vaughan, Barry (1997) Power/knowledge - untying the knot : an examination of a penological method. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
![]()
|
PDF
WRAP_THESIS_Vaughan_1997.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (16Mb) |
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b1404006~S15
Abstract
This thesis examines an assumption that has recently permeated social
theory, that power and knowledge constitute each other and are mutually
reinforcing. Knowledge is an instrument to be used to realise the interests
of some group, i. e. is subservient to agency. This assumption is oblivious to
the rise of realist social theory which has argued that the facilitating
frameworks of social life, structure and culture (which would typically
include 'knowledge') must be construed as having a causal influence
themselves, regardless of what people make of them or do despite them.
These do not automatically satisfy groups' wishes and may hinder them.
The power/knowledge thesis has taken greatest hold in the study of
prisons; it is argued that the penal reforms instituted in the 19th century
were designed to control prisoners so that what seemed like a benevolent
regime was actually an efficient mode of control. Thus the ideas that were
used to direct the treatment of offenders were a means of power over
prisoners. This thesis will incorporate historical material on the development
of the prisons and show that supporting ideas of reform was not necessarily
an exercise in power, so undercutting the principal thesis of the power/knowledge
school.
I will draw on recent developments in social theory to show how the
interplay between power and knowledge might be better conceived. I will
argue that only by estimating the logical connection between ideas can we
understand their proper role- how they may facilitate or frustrate action. Thus I will query whether reform ever gained the prominence it did and
show that it had always to be balanced by its logical counterpart,
deterrence.
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare | ||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Power (Philosophy), Knowledge, Theory of, Prisons -- Great Britain -- History -- 19th century, Prison reformers -- Great Britain -- History -- 19th century | ||||
Official Date: | January 1997 | ||||
Dates: |
|
||||
Institution: | University of Warwick | ||||
Theses Department: | Department of Sociology | ||||
Thesis Type: | PhD | ||||
Publication Status: | Unpublished | ||||
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: | Archer, Margaret Scotford | ||||
Extent: | vii, 332 leaves | ||||
Language: | eng |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year