Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Reviving an ancient-modern quarrel : a critique of Derrida's reading of Plato and Platoism

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Irwin, Jones (1997) Reviving an ancient-modern quarrel : a critique of Derrida's reading of Plato and Platoism. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_THESIS_Irwin_1997.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (13Mb)
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b1358399~S15

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This thesis begins from an analysis of Derrida's specific readings of Plato and
Platonism, identifying there a modernist bias, which interprets these metaphysical
systems as if they were coextensive with Cartesian rationalism. Against Derrida, I
argue for a repositioning of Plato and Platonism in the context of an ancient-modern
quarrel. In replacing Descartes's "clarity and distinctness" with a pre-modern
emphasis on "faith" (pistis), I am seeking to challenge Derrida's diagnosis of a
perplexity or impasse (aporia) which cannot be overcome by philosophy. With
specific reference to the Meno and the Phaedrus, one can locate a three-tiered
Platonic dialectic beginning with an assertion of knowledge, followed by a necessary
deconstruction of this knowledge with, thirdly, a tentative reconstruction of
philosophy based on faith rather than knowing. In later chapters, I examine this
dialectic as it is developed in the Neo- and Christian- Platonist traditions, particularly
through the work of Plotinus, Boethius and Augustine.
On my interpretation, deconstruction remains at the second level of the Platonic
dialectic, that of impasse and perplexity (one of Derrida's most recent texts is in fact
entitled Aporias). Again with reference to an ancient-modern quarrel, it is my
contention that Derrida's unstinting stress on the "aporetic" is due to an overemphasis
of the Cartesian paradigm. Derrida identifies the exhaustion of what Deeley calls "the
classical modern paradigm" with the exhaustion of philosophy per se. But this
identification of philosophy with Cartesianism can be seriously challenged through a
renewed foregrounding of the premodern philosophical resources which Descartes
(and now Derrida) have sought to obscure.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Derrida, Jacques -- Criticism and interpretation, Plato -- Criticism and interpretation, Platonists, Deconstruction
Official Date: December 1997
Dates:
DateEvent
December 1997Submitted
Institution: University of Warwick
Theses Department: Department of Philosophy
Thesis Type: PhD
Publication Status: Unpublished
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: Warner, Martin ; Barrett, Cyril
Sponsors: British Academy ; University of Warwick
Extent: 260 leaves
Language: eng

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us