
The Library
Does strengthening Collective Action Clauses (CACs) help?
Tools
Ghosal, Sayantan and Thampanishvong, Kannika (2013) Does strengthening Collective Action Clauses (CACs) help? Journal of International Economics, Volume 89 (Number 1). pp. 68-78. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.04.003 ISSN 0022-1996.
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.04.003
Abstract
Does improving creditor coordination by strengthening CACs lead to efficiency gains in the functioning of sovereign bond markets? We address this question in a model featuring both debtor moral hazard and creditor coordination under incomplete information. Conditional on default, we characterize the interim efficient CAC threshold and show that strengthening CACs away from unanimity results in interim welfare gains. However, once the impact of strengthening CACs on debtor's incentives is taken into account, we demonstrate the robust possibility of a conflict between ex ante and interim efficiency. We calibrate our model to quantify such a welfare trade-off and discuss the policy implications of our results.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory | ||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics | ||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of International Economics | ||||
Publisher: | Elsevier BV | ||||
ISSN: | 0022-1996 | ||||
Official Date: | January 2013 | ||||
Dates: |
|
||||
Volume: | Volume 89 | ||||
Number: | Number 1 | ||||
Page Range: | pp. 68-78 | ||||
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.04.003 | ||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||
Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||
Funder: | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) | ||||
Grant number: | RES 156-25-0032 |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |