The Library
Precautionary and proactionary as the new right and the new left of the twenty-first century ideological spectrum
Tools
Fuller, Steve (2012) Precautionary and proactionary as the new right and the new left of the twenty-first century ideological spectrum. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, Vol.25 (No.4). pp. 157-174. doi:10.1007/s10767-012-9127-2 ISSN 0891-4486.
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9127-2
Abstract
Despite its specific origin in the seating arrangement of the French National Assembly after the revolution of 1789, the right–left divide of the ideological spectrum has proved remarkably resilient in anchoring public intellectual life for over two centuries. In this article, I argue that we are witnessing a 90° rotation of this ideological axis, resulting in a new set of poles, each of which combines elements of the old right–left divide. The ‘precautionary’ pole brings together the conservationist side of the right and the communitarian side of the left, whereas the ‘proactionary’ pole unites the libertarian side of the right and the technocratic side of the left. I prepare the ground for discussing these new alternatives with a consideration of the political theology of the old right–left divide, which ultimately turns on alternative visions of how the past determines the future. This ‘left’ basically holds that what is possible significantly exceeds what is probable, with liberals adopting an ‘antirealist’ and socialists a ‘realist’ stance towards the prospect of an optimal social order. Both the precautionary and proactionary poles of the new ideological spectrum are fixated on our attitude towards a future in which the ontological constitution of the polity (i.e. its ‘humanity’) is among the issue under contestation. In this emerging ideological conflict, more of which is transpiring in video than in print, the precautionaries are marked as more ‘risk-averse’ and the proactionaries more ‘risk-seeking’ than had been presumed to be the normal attitude in the modern welfare state.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology | ||||
Journal or Publication Title: | International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society | ||||
Publisher: | Springer New York LLC | ||||
ISSN: | 0891-4486 | ||||
Official Date: | 2012 | ||||
Dates: |
|
||||
Volume: | Vol.25 | ||||
Number: | No.4 | ||||
Page Range: | pp. 157-174 | ||||
DOI: | 10.1007/s10767-012-9127-2 | ||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||
Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |