Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Comparing generalisation in children and adults learning an artificial language

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Wonnacott, Elizabeth, Brown, Helen and Nation, Kate (2013) Comparing generalisation in children and adults learning an artificial language. In: Child Language Seminar, Manchester, UK, 24-25 Jun 2013

[img]
Preview
Text (Conference poster)
WRAP_Wonnacott_comparing_2013_poster.pdf - Presentation

Download (527Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://www.psych-sci.manchester.ac.uk/aboutus/even...

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Successful language acquisition involves generalization, but learners must balance this against the acquisition of lexical constraints. Examples occur throughout language. For example, English native speakers know that certain noun-adjective combinations are impermissible (e.g., strong winds, high winds, strong breezes, *high breezes). Another example is the restrictions imposed by verb sub-categorization (e.g., I gave/sent/threw the
ball to him; I gave/sent/threw him the ball; I donated/carried/pushed the ball to him; * I
donated/carried/pushed him the ball; Baker, 1979). A central debate has been the extent
to which learning such patterns depends on semantic cues (Pinker, 1989) and/or distributional statistics (Braine et al., 1990). The current experiments extend previous work which used Artificial Language learning to
demonstrate that adults (Wonnacott et al., 2008) and 6 year olds (Wonnacott, 2011) are able to learn lexically based restrictions on generalization using distributional statistics.
Here we directly compare the two age groups learning the same artificial language, with a view to exploring maturational differences in language learning. In addition to manipulating frequency (across high and low frequency items) and quantity of exposure (across days),
languages were constructed such that a word’s semantic class was helpful for learning the restrictions for some types of lexical items, but potentially misleading for others.

Item Type: Conference Item (Poster)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
P Language and Literature > PM Hyperborean, Indian, and Artificial languages
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Languages, Artificial -- Study and teaching -- Psychological aspects, Language acquisition, Language acquisition -- Age factors, Psycholinguistics
Official Date: 2013
Dates:
DateEvent
2013UNSPECIFIED
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Conference Paper Type: Poster
Title of Event: Child Language Seminar
Type of Event: Other
Location of Event: Manchester, UK
Date(s) of Event: 24-25 Jun 2013

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us