Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

On the constitutional question in global governance : global administrative law and the conflicts-law approach in comparison

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Kuo, Ming-Sung (2013) On the constitutional question in global governance : global administrative law and the conflicts-law approach in comparison. Global Constitutionalism, Volume 2 (Number 3). pp. 437-468. doi:10.1017/S204538171300004X ISSN 2045-3817.

[img]
Preview
Text
WRAP_Kuo_S204538171300004Xa.pdf - Published Version

Download (481Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S204538171300004X

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The question of constitutionalization cuts through the heart of theoretical debate on the fragmentation of global governance. This paper aims to contribute to this debate through a comparison of global administrative law (GAL) and the conflicts-law approach. While the conflicts-law approach espouses the move towards global constitutionalism, GAL disavows constitutional ambition. I make a twofold argument. First, the differing diagnoses these two approaches make of global governance lead to their distinct proposed solutions. GAL identifies the lack of accountability as the underlying concern of global governance and responds to fragmented global governance through balancing-centred legal management. The conflicts-law approach instead attributes the challenges facing global governance to the ill-designed democratic institutions in nation states and turns to ‘democratic juridification’ as the solution. Second, GAL and the conflicts-law approach reflect two distinct images of constitutionalism. GAL’s ‘constitutional deficit’ suggests its implicit embrace of a version of constitutionalism rooted in the tradition of populist democracy. The conflicts-law approach situates transnational democracy in the conflicts-law process in which inter-regime conflicts are resolved, suggesting a prototype of constitutionalized global governance underpinned by an epistemic understanding of democracy.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: K Law [Moys] > KC International Law
K Law [Moys] > KM Common Law, Public Law
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Administrative law, Constitutional law, International relations, World politics, Globalization, Democracy
Journal or Publication Title: Global Constitutionalism
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 2045-3817
Official Date: November 2013
Dates:
DateEvent
November 2013Published
Volume: Volume 2
Number: Number 3
Page Range: pp. 437-468
DOI: 10.1017/S204538171300004X
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 1 August 2016
Date of first compliant Open Access: 1 August 2016

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us