Hodgkinson, Gerard P. and Ford, J. Kevin (2014) Narrative, meta-analytic, and systematic reviews : what are the differences and why do they matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, Volume 35 (Supplement 1). S1-S5. doi:10.1002/job.1918 ISSN 0894-3796.

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This issue comprises the second IRIOP Annual Review Issue, following the incorporation of the International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (IRIOP) into the Journal of Organizational Behavior (JOB). In this editorial, we highlight important differences between narrative, meta-analytic, and systematic review techniques and explain how each of these approaches to the reviewing of scholarly work has the potential to contribute to the continuing development of the IRIOP Annual Review Issue, as the leading outlet for the publication of critical, state-of-the-art overviews and commentary on established knowledge and developments at the forefront of the field. In so doing, we clarify further the sorts of contributions we are looking to publish, exemplified by the seven papers appearing in this second issue. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Marketing & Strategic Management Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Organizational Behavior
Publisher:	John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ISSN:	0894-3796
Official Date:	February 2014
Dates:	Date Event February 2014 Published 27 January 2014 Available
Volume:	Volume 35
Number:	Supplement 1
Page Range:	S1-S5
DOI:	10.1002/job.1918
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item