Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Samuel Pepys and corruption

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Knights, Mark (2014) Samuel Pepys and corruption. Parliamentary History, Volume 33 (Number 1). pp. 19-35. doi:10.1111/1750-0206.12087 ISSN 0264-2824.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_4 - KNIGHTS ARTICLE_edBM(notc)_CJ_1v2.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (769Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-0206.12087

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Picking up a theme that runs through David Hayton's work, this article examines corruption in the later Stuart period through a case study of Samuel Pepys. The latter's diary can be read alongside the public record of parliamentary inquiries and vilification in the press, allowing us a rare opportunity to study corruption simultaneously through the eyes of a perpetrator and his critics. Pepys reveals ambiguities in how corruption was defined and defended. At the same time as he criticized corruption in others, he took bribes and extorted favours but either lied about them when confronted, or excused them as lawful gifts from friends and those grateful for his services, arguing that his acceptance of them never worked against the king's interest. His critics, on the other hand, queried the compatibility of his private advantage and the public interest, and depicted him as greedy, hypocritical and unjust. Pepys thus illustrates contested notions of corrupt behaviour. The attack on Pepys also shows the political motives behind campaigns against corruption: the libel published against him was part of the murky world of popish plot intrigue, with clear overtones of both catholic and sexual misdemeanour. Popery and lust were associated with corrupt behaviour. Pepys's story was part of a larger one about long-term shifts in the nature of officeholding, state formation, the public interest, patronage and the culture of gift-giving that needs further exploration.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: D History General and Old World > DA Great Britain
J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain
Divisions: Faculty of Arts > History
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Pepys, Samuel, 1633-1703, Great Britain -- History -- Stuarts, 1603-1714, Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons -- Corrupt practices
Journal or Publication Title: Parliamentary History
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ISSN: 0264-2824
Official Date: February 2014
Dates:
DateEvent
February 2014Published
3 March 2014Available
1 August 2013Accepted
Volume: Volume 33
Number: Number 1
Page Range: pp. 19-35
DOI: 10.1111/1750-0206.12087
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 1 July 2016
Date of first compliant Open Access: 1 July 2016

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us