Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Who should cast the casting vote? Using sequential voting to amalgamate information

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Alpern, Steve and Chen, Bo (2017) Who should cast the casting vote? Using sequential voting to amalgamate information. Theory and Decision, 83 (2). pp. 259-282. doi:10.1007/s11238-017-9593-0 ISSN 0040-5833.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-who-cast-casting-vote-Chen-2017.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1014Kb) | Preview
[img] PDF
WRAP_td_preprint_2017-02-24.pdf - Accepted Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (1315Kb)
Official URL: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9593-0

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

In this study we are concerned with how agents can best amalgamate their private information about a binary state of Nature. The agents are heterogeneous in their "ability", the quality of their private information. The agents cannot directly communicate their private information but instead can only vote between the two states (say "Innocent" or "Guilty" on a criminal jury). We first describe possible methods of sequential majority voting, and then we analyze a particular one: the first n - 1 jurors vote simultaneously and, in the case of a tie, the remaining juror has the casting vote. We prove that when n = 3 (a common situation for a tribunal of three judges) the probability of a correct verdict is maximized when the agent of median ability has the casting vote.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: K Law [Moys] > KM Common Law, Public Law
Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Operational Research & Management Sciences
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Verdicts -- Mathematical models, Jury, Jurors
Journal or Publication Title: Theory and Decision
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
ISSN: 0040-5833
Official Date: 7 March 2017
Dates:
DateEvent
7 March 2017Published
24 February 2017Accepted
13 May 2015Submitted
Volume: 83
Number: 2
Page Range: pp. 259-282
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-017-9593-0
Institution: University of Warwick
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 27 February 2017
Date of first compliant Open Access: 31 July 2017
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us