Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

What rights are eclipsed when risk is defined by corporatism? : governance and GM food

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Anderson, Paul (2004) What rights are eclipsed when risk is defined by corporatism? : governance and GM food. Theory, Culture & Society, 21 (6). pp. 155-169. doi:10.1177/0263276404050460 ISSN 0263-2764.

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276404050460

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Governance by corporate power and financial institutions has long been associated with the demise of the public arena and substantive democracy (Chomsky, 1992; Habermas, 1992; Westbrook, 1991). Significant among contributing factors is the presentation of new technologies. The central contention of this paper is that where public debate on the introduction or extension of new technologies is prescribed to the technical limits of the expert, such dialogue can be confined to areas which in no way question the role of these technologies in the de facto selection of an exclusive kind of society whose development they serve. It is precisely attention to the technically-defined social, economic and environmental impacts of certain technologies, at the expense of attention to their role in shaping society, that underwrites this agenda for narrowing avenues of meaningful public participation. Such confinement limits popular democratic and NGO efforts to influence the use of such technologies. As a consequence, these efforts are unlikely to succeed unless and until the reasons for narrowing public political discourse down to a technology’s technically defined risks, costs and benefits are better understood and challenged.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal or Publication Title: Theory, Culture & Society
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN: 0263-2764
Official Date: 2004
Dates:
DateEvent
2004Published
Volume: 21
Number: 6
Page Range: pp. 155-169
DOI: 10.1177/0263276404050460
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us