Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Formal comment to Pettengill : the time to most recent common ancestor does not (usually) approximate the date of divergence

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Achtman, Mark, Zhou, Zhemin and Didelot, Xavier (2015) Formal comment to Pettengill : the time to most recent common ancestor does not (usually) approximate the date of divergence. PLoS One, 10 (8). pp. 1-11. e0134435. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134435 ISSN 1932-6203.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_9577424-ms-170815-achtman_zhou_didelot.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (2049Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134435

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

In 2013 Zhou et al. concluded that Salmonella enterica serovar Agona represents a genetically monomorphic lineage of recent ancestry, whose most recent common ancestor existed in 1932, or earlier. The Abstract stated ‘Agona consists of three lineages with minimal mutational diversity: only 846 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have accumulated in the non-repetitive, core genome since Agona evolved in 1932 and subsequently underwent a major population expansion in the 1960s.’ These conclusions have now been criticized by Pettengill, who claims that the evolutionary models used to date Agona may not have been appropriate, the dating estimates were inaccurate, and the age of emergence of Agona should have been qualified by an upper limit reflecting the date of its divergence from an outgroup, serovar Soerenga. We dispute these claims. Firstly, Pettengill’s analysis of Agona is not justifiable on technical grounds. Secondly, an upper limit for divergence from an outgroup would only be meaningful if the outgroup were closely related to Agona, but close relatives of Agona are yet to be identified. Thirdly, it is not possible to reliably date the time of divergence between Agona and Soerenga. We conclude that Pettengill’s criticism is comparable to a tempest in a teapot.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QL Zoology
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Molecular evolution, Divergence (Biology)
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS One
Publisher: Public Library of Science
ISSN: 1932-6203
Official Date: 14 August 2015
Dates:
DateEvent
14 August 2015Published
9 June 2015Accepted
16 May 2015Submitted
Volume: 10
Number: 8
Number of Pages: 11
Page Range: pp. 1-11
Article Number: e0134435
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134435
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 30 December 2015
Date of first compliant Open Access: 30 December 2015
Funder: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Great Britain) (BBSRC), National Institute for Health Research (Great Britain) (NIHR)
Grant number: BB/L020319/1 (BBSRC)

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us