Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The disenchanted island : a political history of The Tempest, 1760-1830

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Taylor, David F. (2012) The disenchanted island : a political history of The Tempest, 1760-1830. Shakespeare Quarterly , 63 (4). pp. 487-517. doi:10.1353/shq.2012.0057 ISSN 0037-3222.

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/shq.2012.0057

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This essay offers a political history of The Tempest from the close of the Seven Years' War (1762) to the beginning of the reform era (1830). It constructs this history by close readings of several graphic satires that appropriated the play in order to frame and interrogate contemporary politics. First, this essay stresses the remarkable consistency with which Georgian political prints invoked The Tempest's dramatic elaboration of "islandness" to negotiate a distinct set of ideological concerns. Caricaturists pressed Prospero's island into service as a proxy Britain at moments when the nation was acutely conscious both of its own territorial borders (threatened invasion, the redrawing of imperial boundaries) and of the contested limits of royal prerogative. Second, the essay reads these caricatures of The Tempest in terms of key shifts in the political coding of the play during a period of domestic and imperial crisis. The first such shift, in the 1780s and 1790s, found the play closely associated with the opposition Whigs led by Charles James Fox. The second, expressed most clearly in the 1820s, involved the increasing obsolescence, even inversion, of a once-secure interpretation of the play as a typology of British monarchical paternalism. The history this essay unfolds—a history entwined with the stage history of The Tempest—is one in which Prospero the father-king is shadowed and finally usurped by Prospero the despot.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Arts > English and Comparative Literary Studies
Journal or Publication Title: Shakespeare Quarterly
Publisher: The Johns Hopkins University Press
ISSN: 0037-3222
Official Date: 2012
Dates:
DateEvent
2012Published
Volume: 63
Number: 4
Page Range: pp. 487-517
DOI: 10.1353/shq.2012.0057
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us