The Library
Human Rights and hactivism : the cases of Wikileaks and anonymous
Tools
Sorell, Tom (2015) Human Rights and hactivism : the cases of Wikileaks and anonymous. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 7 (3). pp. 391-410. doi:10.1093/jhuman/huv012 ISSN 1757-9619.
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huv012
Abstract
Traditional human rights concepts seem to fit Internet activity when it is broadly allied to conventional political mobilization and when it occurs in human rights-violating jurisdictions. Traditional concepts are strained, however, when Internet activity takes the unconventional form of ‘hacktivism’, and it occurs in human-rights respecting jurisdictions. Hacktivism is still activism but not always open or democratic activism. Unlike more familiar forms of activism, hacktivism can often be anonymous, sometimes gratuitously so, and can operate with a kind of impunity that its technology seems to afford. Hacktivism is sometimes also claimed to serve interests that transcend those of particular states, that is, the interests of the global population generally. But this claim is implausible if hacktivism is not accountable to anyone. Taking the cases of Wikileaks and Anonymous, I argue that some of the activities of these groups are highly questionable, and that forms of cyberactivism more strongly connected with public displays of protest and legally accountable disclosure are morally superior and cohere better with human rights. This line of thought is, admittedly, easier to articulate in the case of Wikileaks than in the case of Anonymous, whose free-form set of causes and swarm activity are not always attributable to a stable collective entity. The activities of these two groups are chosen for four reasons: because they are both prominent in hacktivism; because they together represent quite a lot of the spectrum of hacktivism; because they have operated at times in concert, and because, in the case of Wikileaks at least, the rationale for its activity is sometimes stated in the language of human rights.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies | ||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Human Rights Practice | ||||||
Publisher: | Oxford University Press | ||||||
ISSN: | 1757-9619 | ||||||
Official Date: | 22 September 2015 | ||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||
Volume: | 7 | ||||||
Number: | 3 | ||||||
Page Range: | pp. 391-410 | ||||||
DOI: | 10.1093/jhuman/huv012 | ||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |