Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Fighting 'terrorism', repressing democracy : surveillance and resistance in the UK

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Anderson, Paul (2016) Fighting 'terrorism', repressing democracy : surveillance and resistance in the UK. Working Paper. Coventry: School of Law, University of Warwick. Legal Studies Research Paper, 2016 . (Unpublished)

[img] PDF
WRAP_1272661-la-280416-pna-_fighting_terrorism_or_repressing_democracy.pdf - Published Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (190Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/research/pub...

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

‘Terrorism’ offers salient means to justify a level of social repression that would be intolerable in normal
times. A criticism is that repression has gone too far. Although pertinent, focus on the proper extent of
repression tends to overlook a less noticed yet critical feature of governments’ use of anti-terror power: the
prior erosion of democratic oversight and control which enables repression to appear a plausible response to
a largely unspecified threat. A case in point is the British government’s programme to progressively monitor
the entire population’s online activity and paper, electronic and telephonic communication on grounds that
this is ‘necessary to fight serious crime and terrorism’. This paper lays bare certain problems with that
programme in two ways. Theoretically, it infuses some legal criticism of mass surveillance with relevant
theoretical input, particularly from perspectives of critical political economy and democratic theory. This
facilitates a more precise characterisation of the erosion of democratic oversight and control.
Methodologically, it frames the more theoretical input in terms relevant to legal mobilisation and which
permit greater scope for practical effect, namely, terms of judicial review. Such framing offers one avenue by
which the effectiveness of resistance to mass surveillance may increase.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Series Name: Legal Studies Research Paper
Publisher: School of Law, University of Warwick
Place of Publication: Coventry
Official Date: May 2016
Dates:
DateEvent
May 2016Created
Volume: 2016
Number of Pages: 29
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Unpublished
Date of first compliant deposit: 29 April 2016

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us