
The Library
Not all low-carbon energy pathways are environmentally “no-regrets” options
Tools
Konadu, D. Dennis, Mourão, Zenaida Sobral, Allwood, Julian M., Richards, Keith S., Kopec, Grant M., McMahon, Richard A. and Fenner, Richard A. (2015) Not all low-carbon energy pathways are environmentally “no-regrets” options. Global Environmental Change, 35 . pp. 379-390. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.10.002 ISSN 0959-3780.
![]() |
PDF
WRAP_1-s2.0-S0959378015300601-main.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (2691Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.10.002
Abstract
Energy system pathways which are projected to deliver minimum possible deployment cost, combined with low Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, are usually considered as ‘no-regrets’ options. However, the question remains whether such energy pathways present ‘no-regrets’ when also considering the wider environmental resource impacts, in particular those on land and water resources. This paper aims to determine whether the energy pathways of the UK’s Carbon Plan are environmental “no-regrets” options, defined in this study as simultaneously exhibiting low impact on land and water services resulting from resource appropriation for energy provision. This is accomplished by estimating the land area and water abstraction required by 2050 under the four pathways of the Carbon Plan with different scenarios for energy crop composition, yield, and power station locations. The outcomes are compared with defined limits for sustainable land appropriation and water abstraction.
The results show that of the four Carbon Plan pathways, only the “Higher Renewables, more energy efficiency” pathway is an environmental “no-regrets” option, and that is only if deployment of power stations inland is limited. The study shows that policies for future low-carbon energy systems should be developed with awareness of wider environmental impacts. Failing to do this could lead to a setback in achieving GHG emission reductions goals, because of unforeseen additional competition between the energy sector and demand for land and water services in other sectors.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor T Technology > TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering |
||||||||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Engineering > WMG (Formerly the Warwick Manufacturing Group) | ||||||||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Carbon dioxide mitigation, Land use, Water use, Environmental policy -- Great Britain | ||||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Global Environmental Change | ||||||||||
Publisher: | Pergamon | ||||||||||
ISSN: | 0959-3780 | ||||||||||
Official Date: | November 2015 | ||||||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||||||
Volume: | 35 | ||||||||||
Page Range: | pp. 379-390 | ||||||||||
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.10.002 | ||||||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | ||||||||||
Funder: | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) | ||||||||||
Grant number: | EP/K039326/1 |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year