Smets, Michael, Aristidou, Angela and Whittington, Richard (2017) Towards a practice-driven institutionalism. In: Greenwood, Royston and Oliver, Christine and Lawrence, Thomas B. and Meyer, Renate, (eds.) The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage Publication Ltd, pp. 384-411. ISBN 9781526415035

	PDF WRAP-Smets-Aristidou-WhittingtonTowards-Practice-Driven-Institutionalism-2017.pdf - Published Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (467Kb)
	PDF (copyright form) WRAP-Smets_Aristidou_Towards_a-Practice-2017-Copyright-Form.pdf - Other Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (167Kb)

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Recent years have seen an increasing mutual engagement between institutional and strategy-as-practice scholars who realize that they can learn from each other to address critical blind spots in their respective theories (Smets, Greenwood, & Lounsbury, 2015a; Suddaby, Seidl, & Lê, 2013; Vaara & Whittington, 2012). In this chapter, we argue that this nascent dialogue is bringing about a Practice-Driven Institutionalism (PDI) that more truthfully reflects the intellectual heritage of institutional theory and, in doing so, sheds a more comprehensive light on modern-day issues of organizing and work (Barley & Kunda, 2001; Feldman & Orlikowski, 2011).
Institutional theorists are thereby following the “practice turn” which has characterized much of organization theory in the last twenty years (Barrett, Oborn, Orlikowski, & Yates, 2012;
Sandberg & Tsoukas, 2011; Schatzki, Knorr-Cetina, & Savigny, 2001; Whittington, 2006). Especially, they build on strong process- and practice-driven ontologies which the literatures on routines (e.g., Feldman, 2016; Feldman & Pentland, 2003; Parmigiani & Howard-Grenville,
2011), technology-as-practice (and as institution) (e.g., Orlikowski, 1996, 2000; Orlikowski & Barley, 2001) and strategy-as-practice (for reviews, see: Smets et al., 2015a; Suddaby et al., 2013) have carried into the organizational literature. In following this turn, institutionalists seek to enhance their understanding of how institutions play out on the “coalface” of everyday life (Barley, this volume). Specifically, PDI advances their theorizing of institutional logics (e.g., Ocasio, Thornton & Lounsbury, this volume; Thornton, Ocasio, & Lounsbury, 2012), the complexities that occur when incompatible logics clash (e.g., Greenwood et al., 2011; Kraatz & Block, this volume), and the institutional work required to create, change, or maintain institutions under those conditions (e.g., Lawrence, this volume; Lawrence, Leca, & Zilber, 2013;
Lawrence & Suddaby, 2006). In this sense, PDI cuts across and informs the dominant conversations of current institutionalist theorizing.

Item Type:	Book Item
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Publisher:	Sage Publication Ltd
Place of Publication:	London
ISBN:	9781526415035
Book Title:	The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism
Editor:	Greenwood, Royston and Oliver, Christine and Lawrence, Thomas B. and Meyer, Renate
Official Date:	2017
Dates:	Date Event 2017 Published 26 June 2016 Accepted
Number of Pages:	18
Page Range:	pp. 384-411
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit:	5 June 2017
Related URLs:	Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item