Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The interplay of the Dirty Hands of British area bombing and the Wicked Problem of defeating Nazi Germany in World War II - a lesson in leadership ethics

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Sanders, Paul and Grint, Keith (2019) The interplay of the Dirty Hands of British area bombing and the Wicked Problem of defeating Nazi Germany in World War II - a lesson in leadership ethics. Leadership, 15 (3). pp. 271-295. doi:10.1177/1742715017751532 ISSN 1742-7150.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-interplay-Dirty-Hands-bombing-Wicked-Problem-defeating-Nazi-Grint-2017.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (803Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715017751532

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The British area bombing of Germany in World War II has provided for enduring ethical controversy. Eschewing conventional approaches, we present area bombing as a Dirty Hands leadership response to the Wicked Problem of Britain’s wartime strategic predicament. Using historical methodology, we establish two distinct phases in area bombing: 1942-1944, when this was ethically contentious but politically necessary; and 1944-1945, which lacks a Dirty Hands legitimation. The second phase follows upon a six-month lull in area bombing during Bomber Command’s assignment to Overlord (D-Day) duties. It is characterised by credible alternatives to area bombing, a waning sense of proportionality in Bomber Command activity, and intensifying death and destruction without justifiable purpose. We relate the breaching of the boundaries of Dirty Hands in Phase II to a precise date - September 1944. This coincides with the mutation of the strategic Wicked Problem into a Critical Problem, visible in the stalling of the Allied land campaign in France. Mistaking this for a Tame Problem, the C-in-C of Bomber Command, Arthur Harris, exploits the political context to escalate his commitment. Following Watters’ (2017) alignment of Critical Problems with Virtue Ethics, we argue that Harris’ leadership in Phase II is not consistent with Virtue Ethics (of which recognition of the boundaries of Dirty Hands is a function). Harris is the archetype of the leader who gets away with exploiting a Wicked Problem because his superiors have let down their guard. In the final instance, his failure of ethical leadership becomes their own.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
D History General and Old World > D History (General) > D731 World War II
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
U Military Science > U Military Science (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Industrial Relations & Organisational Behaviour
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): War--Moral and ethical aspects, Command of troops , Leadership , World War, 1939-1945 , World War, 1939-1945--Moral and ethical aspects, World War, 1939-1945--Moral and ethical aspects--Germany, World War, 1939-1945--Campaigns--Germany, Military ethics , Leadership--Moral and ethical aspects
Journal or Publication Title: Leadership
Publisher: Sage
ISSN: 1742-7150
Official Date: 1 June 2019
Dates:
DateEvent
1 June 2019Published
27 February 2017Available
1 December 2017Accepted
Volume: 15
Number: 3
Page Range: pp. 271-295
DOI: 10.1177/1742715017751532
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 4 December 2017
Date of first compliant Open Access: 6 March 2018

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us