Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

James Shirley and the Restoration Stage

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Crowther, Stefania (2017) James Shirley and the Restoration Stage. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Theses_Crowther_2017.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (3332Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b3141069~S1

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

James Shirley is a distinctly Caroline playwright: his first play was performed in the year of Charles I’s coronation, 1625, and his last the year of the outbreak of civil war in 1642. Yet his importance extends beyond the era in which he worked as a professional playwright. As one among a handful of dramatists whose work was staged regularly by the new playing companies after the theatres reopened in 1660, he is an important figure in the development of new modes of theatre. Despite having had more of his plays produced on the Restoration stage than Shakespeare did, scholarship on his significance to Restoration drama has been remarkably scant. This thesis investigates the significance of Shirley in the Carolean period, tracing the adaptations of Shirley throughout the reign of Charles II. It uses Shirley as a case study to investigate transitions in theatrical practice before 1642 and after 1660, paying attention also to the continuities. This thesis asks why Shirley’s plays were considered suitable by the managers of the Restoration theatre companies who staged them: the King’s Company under Sir Thomas Killigrew, the Duke’s Company under Sir William Davenant, George Jolly’s ‘Nursery’ group, performing at Hatton Garden, and the Red Bull Players, an illegal, pre-Restoration group. It also explores the ways in which Shirley’s plays were adapted in response to the changed social and political climate after 1660, including textual amendments made and the addition of new prologues. It concludes by asking why Shirley’s reputation declined so sharply in the long eighteenth century while Shakespeare’s came to pre-eminence, by comparing the Restoration treatment of his plays with those of Shakespeare.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Subjects: P Language and Literature > PR English literature
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Shirley, James,1596-1666 -- Criticism and interpretation., Theater -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century, Dramatists, English -- Early modern, 1500-1700.
Official Date: June 2017
Dates:
DateEvent
June 2017Submitted
Institution: University of Warwick
Theses Department: Centre for the Study of the Renaissance
Thesis Type: PhD
Publication Status: Unpublished
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: Grant, Teresa, 1972-
Sponsors: Arts and Humanities Research Council ; University of Warwick
Extent: 362 leaves
Language: eng

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us