How and why do student teachers use ICT?
Hammond, Michael, 1956-, Reynolds, Lawrence J. and Ingram, Jennifer. (2011) How and why do student teachers use ICT? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol.27 (No.3). pp. 191-203. ISSN 02664909Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00389.x
This paper examines how and why student teachers made use of information and communication technology (ICT) during a 1-year initial teacher education programme from 2008 to 2009. This is a mixed methods study involving a survey (N = 340) of the entire cohort and a series of semi-structured interviews with a sample of student teachers within the cohort (N = 21). The study explored several themes, including the nature of student teachers' use of ICT; variation in the use of ICT; support for, and constraints on, using ICT; attitudes to ICT and to teaching and learning more generally. It was found that nearly all teachers were receptive to using ICT – more so than their in-service counterparts – and made frequent use of it during their placement (internship) experience. The Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) was central to nearly all student teachers' use of ICT, in good part, because it was already used by their mentors and was widely accessible. Student teachers' use of ICT was categorized in three levels. Routine users focused mostly on the use of the IWB for whole class teaching; extended users gave greater opportunities for pupils to use ICT for themselves; innovative student teachers used ICT in a greater range of contexts and made more effort to overcome barriers such as access. ICT use was seen as emerging from a mix of factors: chiefly student teachers' access to ICT; their feeling of ‘self-efficacy’ when using ICT; and their belief that ICT had a positive impact on learning – in particular, the impact on pupils' behavioural and affective engagement. Factors which influenced ICT use included mentoring, training and support. Limitations on student teachers' use of ICT are explored and it is suggested that new teachers need to be supported in developing a more discerning use as they begin their teaching careers.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
T Technology > T Technology (General)
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Student teachers, Education -- Information technology -- Case studies, Educational technology|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Journal of Computer Assisted Learning|
|Publisher:||Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.|
|Page Range:||pp. 191-203|
|Access rights to Published version:||Restricted or Subscription Access|
|References:||Albion P. (1999) Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers’ preparedness for teaching with technology. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 1999 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (eds J. Price, J. Willis, D. Willis, M. Jost & S. Boger- Mehall), pp. 1602–1608. AACE, Chesapeake, VA. Almas A. & Nilsen A. (2006) ICT competencies for the next generation of teachers. In Current Developments in Technology-assisted Education (eds A. Mendez-Vilas, A. Solano Martin, J. Mesa Gonzalez & J. Mesa Gonzalez), pp. 468–472. Formatex, Badajoz, Spain. Barton R.& Haydn T. (2006) Trainee teachers’ views on what helps them to use information and communication technology effectively in their subject teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22, 257–282. Becta (2003) What the Research Says About Barriers to the Use of ICT in Teaching. Becta, Coventry, West Midlands, UK. Becta (2008) Harnessing Technology Review 2008: The Role of Technology and Its Impact on Education. Becta, Coventry,West Midlands, UK. BESA (2009) School Learning Platform Review. British Educational Suppliers Association, London. Bromfield C. (2006) PGCE secondary trainee teachers & effective behaviour management: an evaluation and commentary. Support for Learning 21, 188–193. Clift R.T., Mullen L., Levin J. & Larson A. (2001) Technologies in contexts: implications for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 17, 33–50. Davies C., Hayward G. & Lukman L. (2006) 14–19 and Digital Technologies: A Review of Research and Projects. Futurelab, Bristol UK. Deaney R. & Hennessy S. (2007) Sustainability, evolution and dissemination of information and communication technology-supported classroom practice. Research Papers in Education 22, 65–94. Dexter S. & Riedel E. (2003) Why improving pre-service teacher educational technology preparation must go beyond the college walls. Journal of Teacher Education 54, 334–346. Ertmer P. (2005) Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development 53, 25–39. Furlong J. &Maynard T. (1995) Mentoring Student Teachers. Routledge, London. Gobbo C. & Girardi M. (2001) Teachers’ beliefs and integration of information and communications technology in Italian schools. Technology 10, 63–85. Grenfell M. (1996) Bourdieu and Initial Teacher Education: a post-structuralist approach. British Educational Research Journal 22, 287–303. Hammond M., Crosson S., Fragkouli E., Ingram J., Johnston- Wilder P., Johnston-Wilder S., Kingston Y., Pope M. & Wray D. (2009) Why do some student teachers make very good use of ICT? An exploratory case study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 18, 59–73. Kay R. (2006) Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: a review of literature. Journal of Reasearch on Technology in Education 38, 383– 408. Markauskaite L. (2006) Gender issues in pre-service teachers’ training: ICT literacy in an Australian context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 22, 1 1–20. Mishra P. & Koehler M. (2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108, 1017–1054. Mutton T., Mills G. & McNicholl J. (2006) Mentor skills in a new context: working with trainee teachers to develop use the use of information and communications technology in their subject teaching. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 15, 337–352. NFER (2008) Harnessing Technology: Schools Survey. Becta, Coventry,West Midlands, UK. Ofsted (2009) Virtual Learning Environments: An Evaluation of Their Development in A Sample of Educational Settings. Ofsted, London. Russell M., Bebell D., O’Dwyer L. & O’Connor K. (2003) Examining teacher technology use. Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education 54, 297–310. Sang G., Valcke M., Braak J. & Tondeur J. (2010) Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education 54, 103–112. Selwood I. & Pilkington R. (2005) Teacher workload: using ICT to release time to teach. Educational Review 57, 163– 174. Simpson M., Payne F., Munro R. & Hughes S. (1999) Using Information and Communications Technology as a pedagogical tool: who educates the educators. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy 25, 247–262. Smith J. (2005) Understanding the beliefs, concerns and priorities of trainee teachers: a multidisciplinary approach. Mentoring and Tutoring 13, 205–219. SniderV.& Roehl R. (2007) Teachers’ beliefs about pedagogy and related issues. Psychology in the School 44, 873– 886. Summers M.& Easdown G. (1996) Information technology in initial teacher training. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 5, 155–172. Underwood J., Baguley T., Banyard P., Dillon G., Farrington- Flint L., Hayes M., Hick P., Le Geyt G., Murphy J., Selwood I. & Wright M. (2009) Personalising Learning. Becta, Coventry,West Midlands, UK. Van Brack J. (2001) Individual characteristics influencing teachers’ class use of computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research 25, 141–157. Van Driel J., Bulte A. & Verloop N. (2007) The relationships between teachers’ general beliefs about teaching and learning and their domain specific curricular beliefs. Learning and Instruction 17, 156–171.|
Actions (login required)