The Library
Schooling effects on subsequent university performance : evidence for the UK university population
Tools
Naylor, Robin Andrew, 1959- and Smith, Jeremy (Jeremy P.) (2002) Schooling effects on subsequent university performance : evidence for the UK university population. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Dept. of Economics. (Warwick economic research papers.
|
PDF
WRAP_Smith_Jeremy_twerp657.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (305Kb) |
Abstract
From a unique data-set identifying the school attended prior to university for a full cohort of UK university students, we examine the determinants of final degree classification. We exploit the detailed school-level information and focus on the influence of school characteristics, such as school type, on subsequent performance of students at university. We estimate that, on average, a male (female) graduate who attended an Independent school is 6.5 (5.4) percentage points less likely to obtain a `good' degree than is a student who attended an LEA (that is, state-sector) school, ceteris paribus. We also find considerable variation around this average figure across different Independent schools. We find that, for males, the variation in the probability of attaining a `good' degree across schools can largely be explained by the level of school fees.
| Item Type: | Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions L Education > LC Special aspects of education > LC5201 Education extension. Adult education. Continuing education |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics |
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Academic achievement -- Great Britain, Higher education and state -- Great Britain, Private schools -- Great Britain |
| Series Name: | Warwick economic research papers |
| Publisher: | University of Warwick. Dept. of Economics |
| Place of Publication: | Coventry |
| Date: | 11 November 2002 |
| Number: | No.657 |
| Number of Pages: | 26 |
| Status: | Not Peer Reviewed |
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access |
| Version or Related Resource: | Smith, J. and Naylor, R. A. (2005). Schooling effects on subsequent university performance: evidence for the UK university population. Economics of Education Review, 24, pp.549-562. |
| Related URLs: | |
| References: | Bee, M., and Dolton, P. (1985). Degree class and pass rates: an inter-university comparison. Higher Education Review, 17, pp.45-52. Bekhradnia, B., and Thompson, J. (2002). Who does best at university? Report, Higher Education Funding Council of England, Bristol. Betts, J. R., and Morell, D. (1999). The deterinants of undergraduate grade point average: the relative importance of family background, high school resources, and peer group effects. Journal of Human Resources, 34, pp.268-293. Blundell, R., Dearden, L., Goodman, A., and Reed, H. (1997). Higher education, employment and earnings in Britain. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies. Bratti, M. (2002). Does the choice of university matter? A study of the difference across UK universities in life science students' degree performance. Economics of Education Review, 21, pp.431-443. Chapman, K. (1996a). An analysis of degree results in geography by gender. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, pp.293-311. Chapman, K. (1996b). Entry qualifications, degree results and value-added in UK universities. Oxford Review of Education, 22, pp.251-262. Dearden, L., Ferri, J., and Meghir, C. (1997). The effect of school quality on educational attainment and wages. Working paper no. w98/3, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London. Dolton, P., and Vignoles, A. (1999). The labour market returns to different types of secondary school curricula. Mimeo, London School of Economics. Eide, and Showalter (1998). The effect of school quality on student performance: a quantile regression approach. Economics Letters, 58, pp.345-350. Hoskins, S. L., Newstead, S. E., and Dennis, I. (1997). Degree performance as a function of age, gender, prior qualifications and discipline studied. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, pp.317-328. Johnes, J., and Taylor, J. (eds.)(1990). Performance indicators in higher education. Oxford: SRHE/OUP. Krueger, A. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, pp.497-532. McNabb, R., Sarmistha, P., and Sloane, P. (1998). Gender differences in student attainment: the case of university students in the UK. Mimeo, University of Cardiff. Naylor, R. A., Smith, J., and McKnight, A. (2002). Why is there a graduate earnings premium for students from independent schools? Bulletin of Economic Research, 54, pp.315-339. Peers, I., and Johnston, M. (1994). Influence of learning context on the relationship between A level attainment and final degree performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, pp.1-18. Rudd, E. (1984). A comparison between the results achieved by women and men studying for first degrees in British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 9, pp.47-57. Sear, K. (1983). The correlation between A-level grades and degree results in England and Wales. Higher Education, 12, pp.609-619. Smith, J., and Naylor, R. A. (2001). Determinants of degree performance in UK universities: a statistical analysis of the 1993 student cohort. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, pp.29-60. |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/88 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools

