How do thesis writers evaluate their own and others’ findings? An appraisal analysis and a pedagogical intervention

[thumbnail of WRAP-how-thesis-writers-evaluate-appraisal-pedagogical-Wharton-2019.pdf]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-how-thesis-writers-evaluate-appraisal-pedagogical-Wharton-2019.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (879kB) | Preview

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Interpreting research findings in doctoral thesis discussions is a demanding rhetorical task for writers, as it requires them to both make propositions of their own findings and engage with previous scholarship by evaluating others’ findings in a way that their academic discourse community finds acceptable. Although many studies have examined thesis writers’ use of evaluative language, they have often focused on a quantitative analysis of its frequency and type within clause boundaries. Our study, in contrast, is based on a qualitative analysis of the co-articulation of different evaluative items across clause boundaries. We find three main patterns of discussing the author’s own results combined with critical engagement with previous literature and we present typical examples to illustrate the construction of interpersonal positioning as the text unfolds. We then discuss some workshops in which we used these findings to help Masters student writers become aware of different strategies for effectively interpreting research findings in writing discussion sections.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Applied Linguistics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Academic writing -- Authorship, Dissertations, Academic, Discourse analysis, Language and languages -- Style
Journal or Publication Title: English for Specific Purposes
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0889-4906
Official Date: October 2019
Dates:
Date
Event
October 2019
Published
17 July 2019
Available
26 June 2019
Accepted
Volume: 56
Page Range: pp. 3-17
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2019.06.002
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 1 August 2019
Date of first compliant Open Access: 17 July 2021
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant ID
RIOXX Funder Name
Funder ID
15QD17
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
UNSPECIFIED
URI: https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/123433/

Export / Share Citation


Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item