Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Students' mental prototypes for functions and graphs

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Tall, David and Bakar, Md. Nor. (1992) Students' mental prototypes for functions and graphs. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol.23 (No.1). pp. 39-50. ISSN 0020-739X

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Tall_dot1992c-bakar-ijmest.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (63Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020739920230105

Abstract

This research study investigates the concept of function developed by students studying English A-level mathematics. It shows that, while students may be able to use functions in their practical mathematics, their grasp of the theoretical nature of the function concept may be tenuous and inconsistent. The hypothesis is that students develop prototypes for the function concept in much the same way as they develop prototypes for concepts in everyday life. The definition of the function concept, though given in the curriculum, is not stressed and proves to be inoperative, with their understanding of the concept reliant on properties of familiar prototype examples: those having regular shaped graphs, such as x2 or sin*, those often encountered (possibly erroneously), such as a circle, those in which y is defined as an explicit formula in x, and so on. Investigations reveal significant misconceptions. For example, threequarters of a sample of students starting a university mathematics course considered that a constant function was not a function in either its graphical or algebraic forms, and threequarters thought that a circle is a function. This reveals a wide gulf between the concepts as perceived to be taught and as actually learned by the students.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute of Education
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Mathematics -- Study and teaching, Functions
Journal or Publication Title: International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
ISSN: 0020-739X
Date: 1992
Volume: Vol.23
Number: No.1
Page Range: pp. 39-50
Identification Number: 10.1080/0020739920230105
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Barnes M 1988: “Understanding the Function Concept: Some Results of Interviews with Secondary and Tertiary Students”, Research on Mathematics Education in Australia, 24-33. Breidenbach D., Dubinsky E., Hawks J, and Nichols D. (in preparation): “Development of the Process Concept of Function”. Department of Education and Science 1989: Mathematics in the National Curriculum, HMSO, London. Dreyfus T. and Vinner S. 1982: “Some aspects of the function concept in college students and junior high school teachers, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Antwerp, 12-17. Even R. 1988: Prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge and understanding about mathematical function, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Michigan State University. Malik M.A. 1980: “Historical and pedagogical aspects of the definition of function”, Int. J. Math. Ed. Sci. Technol. 11,4, 489-92. Markovits Z., Eylon B. & Bruckheimer M. 1988: “Difficulties Students have with the Function Concept”, The Ideas of Algebra, K-12, N.C.T.M. 1988 Yearbook, 43-60. Smith E.E. 1988: “Concepts and thought”, in The psychology of human thought, editors Sternberg R.J and Smith E.E., Cambridge University Press, 19-49. Tall D.O. 1985: Supergraph, (software for BBC compatible computers), Glentop, London. Tall D.O. 1990: “The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: functions, limits, infinity and proof”, Handbook on Research in Mathematics Education, N.C.T.M., (to appear). Vinner S. 1983: “Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function”, The International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 14, 293-305.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/511

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us