
The Library
Conceptual art and aesthetic ideas
Tools
Costello, Diarmuid (2021) Conceptual art and aesthetic ideas. Kantian Review, 26 (4). pp. 603-618. doi:10.1017/S1369415421000388 ISSN 1369-4154.
|
PDF
WRAP-Conceptual-art-aesthetic-ideas-2021.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (594Kb) | Preview |
|
![]() |
PDF
WRAP-Conceptual-art-aesthetic-ideas-2021.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (476Kb) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415421000388
Abstract
This paper considers whether Kant’s aesthetics withstands the challenge of Conceptual Art. I begin by looking at two competing views of Conceptual Art by recent philosophers, before settling on an ‘inclusive’ view of the form: Conceptual Art includes both ‘strong’ and ‘weak’ non-perceptual art (NPA). I then set out two kinds of conceptual complexity that I argue are implicated by all aesthetic judgements of art (as art) on Kant’s view: the concept of art itself, and the idea the work is meant to express (dependent beauty and aesthetic ideas, respectively). I go on to demonstrate the applicability of Kant’s aesthetics to Conceptual Art by considering two works by Lawrence Weiner, which I take to be a work of work of weak and strong NPA respectively.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BH Aesthetics N Fine Arts > N Visual arts (General) For photography, see TR N Fine Arts > NX Arts in general |
||||||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy | ||||||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 -- Aesthetics -- Criticism and interpretation, Aesthetics, Modern -- 18th century, Aesthetics, Conceptual art, Conceptual art -- Philosophy, Weiner, Lawrence -- Criticism and interpretation | ||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Kantian Review | ||||||||
Publisher: | Cambridge University Press | ||||||||
ISSN: | 1369-4154 | ||||||||
Official Date: | December 2021 | ||||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||||
Volume: | 26 | ||||||||
Number: | 4 | ||||||||
Page Range: | pp. 603-618 | ||||||||
DOI: | 10.1017/S1369415421000388 | ||||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): | This article has been accepted for publication in a revised form for publication in Kantian Review https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/kantian-review | ||||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | ||||||||
Copyright Holders: | Diarmuid Costello, © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review | ||||||||
Date of first compliant deposit: | 1 September 2021 | ||||||||
Date of first compliant Open Access: | 1 September 2021 | ||||||||
Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year